What Are the Most Effective Core Teaching Strategies?

(This post may contain affiliate links that won’t change your price but will share some commission. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Please read our disclosure policy for more information.)

I started teaching high school history in 2007, back when smartboards were still novel, and most of us were just trying to survive our first few years. I’ve taught over 1,700 students across two very different worlds…a nationally ranked academic school where parents expected Ivy League acceptances, and a Title I CTE school where showing up consistently was the first victory of the day. Since 2018, I’ve been training K-12 teachers on implementing student-centered learning, and if there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s this: core teaching strategies don’t disappear when you hand the reins to students. They evolve.

The misconception I hear constantly from teachers I work with is that student-centered teaching means the teacher clocks out. They imagine us printing worksheets, camping at our desks, and hoping for the best. I get it. I thought something similar when I first heard the term back in my third year of teaching (and I hate to admit, that’s exactly how I first attempted to execute this method…if you’re one of my former students reading this, I’m so sorry!). But after watching thousands of students move through my classroom once I understood the concept, and now observing hundreds of teachers make the shift, I can tell you that effective teaching strategies in a student-centered environment require more intentionality, not less.

The difference is where your energy goes.

What Student-Centered Learning Actually Looks Like at 8:30 on a Tuesday

Let me paint you a picture from my own classroom during my last year teaching before I moved into teacher training. My sophomores were four days into a project-based learning unit on the Industrial Revolution’s impact on labor movements. When students walked in, they didn’t ask what we were doing today. They already knew. They grabbed their materials, checked their group’s progress board, and got to work without me saying a word.

Was I useless in that moment? Absolutely not.

I was at my computer for the first ten minutes, but I wasn’t scrolling social media. I was monitoring their EdPuzzle responses from the night before, noticing that about 60% of them had struggled with the concept of collective bargaining. That told me exactly where I needed to intervene during the day’s small group work. I was collecting data in real time, adjusting my instructional strategies before most of them had even settled into their seats.

This is the part that doesn’t get talked about enough in professional development sessions. The learning process doesn’t pause while you figure out what to do next. In a dynamic learning environment, you’re constantly reading the room, interpreting student progress, and deciding whether to push forward or pull back. The best teaching strategies are invisible when they’re working well.

During that same block, I spent about twenty minutes circulating among groups, but not in the traditional “walk around and look busy” way that administrators love. I was listening for specific things. Were they using the primary sources I’d provided? Were they making connections to the case studies we’d examined earlier in the week? When I heard one group debating whether factory workers today face similar conditions to 19th-century laborers, I knew the inquiry-based learning was working. They weren’t just memorizing dates. They were building critical thinking skills that would stick.

I spent another fifteen minutes sitting with a group that included three students who typically struggled with reading comprehension. We worked through a particularly dense labor union document together, with me modeling how to annotate and them taking over as they gained confidence. That’s core instruction happening organically, embedded within a student-centered framework rather than separate from it.

The remaining time, I was completely hands-off. Four groups didn’t need me at all. They were in the zone, collaborating, debating, and constructing their presentations. One group member was researching on a laptop while another sketched out a visual timeline. Two students were quietly arguing about whether a particular strike could be considered successful. That disagreement? Pure gold. They were engaged in active learning at its finest, developing problem-solving skills that no lecture could replicate.

When the bell rang, I hadn’t lectured once. I hadn’t collected a single worksheet. But I had collected more formative assessments about where each student stood than any exit ticket could have given me. I knew who needed extra support tomorrow. I knew which groups were ready to present and which needed another day. I knew exactly how to structure the following class period.

That’s the reality of student-centered teaching methods. It’s not easier. It’s more precise.

Why Traditional Teaching Strategies Fall Short for Today’s Students

When I started in 2007, I taught the way I’d been taught. Standing at the front. Notes on the board. Worksheets for practice. Tests on Friday. And for some students, it worked fine. The ones who came in already reading at grade level, already motivated, already supported at home…they succeeded despite my methods, not because of them.

The other students? The ones who worked twenty hours a week to help their family pay rent? The ones who’d been told since elementary school that they weren’t “smart kids”? The ones who learned better by doing than by listening? They slipped through the cracks, and I let them.

It took teaching at a Title I CTE school to finally break me of my attachment to traditional core teaching strategies. These students were no less capable than the ones at my previous school. They just learned in different ways. They needed to see why history mattered to their lives right now. They needed hands-on activities that connected abstract concepts to real world applications. They needed to talk through ideas with peers before writing about them.

When I shifted to project-based learning and collaborative learning structures, everything changed. Suddenly, the student who could barely write a paragraph was explaining supply and demand dynamics to his group because he lived it every day working at his uncle’s auto shop. The girl who slept through my lectures was designing a presentation on labor laws that showed a deeper understanding than half the honors students I’d taught.

I’m not saying this to pat myself on the back. I’m saying it because too many teachers still believe that student-centered approaches are only for certain subjects or certain students. I’ve seen inquiry-based learning work in history, in math, in special education classrooms, in CTE shops. I’ve watched kindergarten teachers use cooperative learning strategies and high school physics teachers design problem-based learning units that rival anything coming out of higher education.

The throughline is always the same: when students take an active role in their learning, they retain more, understand more, and care more.

The Hard Truth About Implementation

Here’s what I wish someone had told me when I started this journey: transitioning to student-centered instructional strategies is uncomfortable, and it should be.

At first, it was chaos. Students weren’t used to being in charge of their learning. They kept asking me what they were supposed to do, and I kept redirecting them to the project guidelines. My understanding was that as long as I wasn’t the one feeding the students the information verbally, then it was student-led. Some parents called, concerned that I wasn’t “teaching” anymore. A few colleagues raised eyebrows when my room got noisy during what they considered instructional time.

I almost went back to my old teaching methods. It would have been easier. The worksheets were already printed. The lectures already had accompanying PowerPoints prepared. The classroom management would have been simpler.

But I’d already seen what was possible.

During that rough first go, one of my most disengaged students, a kid who’d spent the first quarter with his head on his desk, came alive during a group project on World War I propaganda. He wasn’t a strong writer, but he could draw. His group put him in charge of designing their presentation visuals, and for the first time all year, he stayed after class to ask me a question about the assignment.

That moment kept me going through the uncomfortable transition.

Now, after training hundreds of teachers, I can tell you that the discomfort is normal and temporary. Within about six to eight weeks, most classrooms hit what I call the tipping point. Students stop looking to you for every answer. They start looking to each other. They begin managing their own time, resolving their own conflicts, pushing their own thinking.

When that happens, you haven’t lost your job. You’ve elevated it.

Instead of spending your energy on classroom management and behavior redirection, you’re spending it on deep content conversations and individualized support. Instead of grading forty identical worksheets, you’re assessing forty unique demonstrations of understanding. Instead of dreading parent conferences where you have to explain why their child is failing, you’re sharing specific examples of growth and engagement.

Making Student-Centered Work for Every Grade Level and Subject

One question I get constantly from the teachers I train is whether this works for tested subjects or required curricula. The answer is yes, but you have to be strategic about it.

When I teach core teaching strategies in my professional development workshops, I emphasize that student-centered learning isn’t about throwing out your curriculum. It’s about reimagining how students access it.

Take something seemingly straightforward, like sentence structure in an English class. Instead of a worksheet identifying independent and dependent clauses, you could have students work in small groups to analyze song lyrics, identifying clause types in music they actually listen to. Instead of a lecture on thesis statements, you could use peer teaching, where students who’ve mastered the concept explain it to those still struggling.

In my history classes, I used primary source analysis constantly. But instead of having students read documents individually and answer questions, I’d put them in group work structures where each group member analyzed a different source and then taught their findings to the rest of the group. They were developing communication skills and interpersonal skills while still mastering the same content I would have covered in a lecture.

For special education teachers I’ve worked with, student-centered approaches have been particularly transformative. When you have students with widely varying needs in the same classroom, traditional whole-group instruction often fails a significant portion of them. But when you structure your classroom around stations, small groups, and individualized pacing, you can meet individual needs without burning yourself out trying to be everywhere at once.

One middle school special education teacher I coached started using game-based learning for basic skills practice. Her students, who previously avoided any task that felt like work, started begging to stay in during recess to keep playing the review games. She was covering the same content, but the delivery method made all the difference.

The key is remembering that technology integration is a valuable tool in this process, not the goal itself. Digital tools can help you differentiate instruction, provide instant feedback, and free you up to work with small groups, but they’re not a substitute for thoughtful instructional design.

What Administrators and Parents Need to Understand

If you’re a teacher reading this and thinking, “My administration would never support this,” I hear you. I’ve worked in schools where walkthroughs are expected to see direct instruction and silent students. I’ve dealt with parents who equated noise with chaos and group work with wasting class time.

Here’s what I’ve learned about navigating those relationships.

First, you have to be transparent about what you’re doing and why. When I started sending home explanations of our project-based learning units, including the specific standards they addressed and the skills students would develop, parent concerns dropped significantly. When I invited my principal to observe during our most structured collaborative learning time, not the chaotic early days, he saw the engagement and stopped questioning my teaching practices.

Second, you have to be able to articulate the connection between your methods and student outcomes. This is where formative assessments become your best friend. When you can show a parent that their child’s critical thinking has improved because of the way you structure discussions, or demonstrate to an administrator that your students are outperforming peers on common assessments, you build trust in your approach. In these moments, concrete data is your friend.

Third, find your people. Every school has at least a few teachers experimenting with different ways of reaching students. Find them. Share ideas. Observe each other’s classrooms. When I was the only teacher in my building doing flipped classroom work, it was lonely and exhausting. When I found two other teachers willing to try similar approaches, we became each other’s support system and accountability partners.

The Role of Assessment in a Student-Centered Classroom

I used to spend my Sundays buried in grading. Worksheets, quizzes, essays, projects…it never ended. I’d drag a giant bag home Friday afternoon and drag it back Monday morning, having barely made a dent.

When I shifted to student-centered teaching methods, I had to completely rethink assessment.

Summative assessment still existed in my classroom. Students still took tests, wrote papers, and completed final projects. But the way I gathered information about student learning throughout a unit looked completely different.

Instead of collecting and grading nightly homework, I used quick checks during class. While students worked in groups, I circulated with a clipboard, noting who was contributing, who was struggling, and who was ready for more challenge. Instead of waiting for a unit test to discover that half my class didn’t understand a concept, I knew within the first day or two of teaching it and could adjust accordingly.

This is what I call “grading as you go,” and it was the single biggest factor in protecting my time and sanity.

When students work on multi-day projects, they get daily check-ins. Ten minutes before the end of class, I would circulate and verify progress. Did your group accomplish what you needed to today? Show me your work. If yes, full credit. If not, we talk about why and what support you need. This holds students accountable without creating mountains of grading for me.

For skills practice, I use self-grading platforms whenever possible. Students get immediate feedback, and I get data on which concepts need reteaching. I’m not spending hours marking multiple-choice questions correct or incorrect. I’m spending my time analyzing patterns and planning interventions.

And rubrics…well-designed, specific rubrics…have saved me more hours than I can count. When students know exactly what proficient work looks like, they’re more likely to produce it. When I can circle descriptors rather than write the same comments on twenty papers, grading goes faster, and students actually read the feedback.

Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks…or At Least Reminding Her

For teachers who have been in the field for some time, it is intimidating to think about transitioning from teacher-centered to student-centered learning and what those core teaching strategies may be. It is hard to stretch so far outside of one’s comfort zone, but from teachers who have done this, it is well worth the initial discomfort. The differences in student-centered curriculum versus teacher-centered education are distinct, but for the educators who have made the leap, it is a complete game-changer in (and out of) the classroom. A perfect example is an excerpt below from Deborah Baldwin:

When I expressed interest in blogging on the subject of student-centered curriculum, I wasn’t sure if I even knew what it meant. What does it mean to be a learner-centered teacher?

You see, I am recently retired from the classroom. I taught theater classes to every grade level for thirty-eight years. Shouldn’t that be enough experience to know the definition of student-centered learning? Did I teach drama with a student-centered approach? Could I be considered a learner-centered teacher?

Quite frankly, teaching methods come and go, terminology changes, gets a new spin, or maybe fluffed up to become the next innovative educational trend. After a while, if you have taught for any number of years, you have used several methodologies thatare similar. This is not a weakness, however…it is a strength. Education methods change with the times and our students living in those times.

I admit I was concerned that in the two years since I stepped out of the classroom, I was already out of the loop. I quickly researched the subject. Whew! My worries vanished in the first two minutes of perusing a few education websites.

What Does it Mean to be a Learner-Centered Teacher

According to an article found here at EdTechReview, “In student-centered classrooms, students are the focus, and they play the central role where they are actively engaged in their learning process in a collaborative nature along with their peers and under the guidance of their teacher.”

When I read this, I laughed at myself for my earlier befuddlement. Of course, drama class has a student-centered curriculum! How could it not? According to this, I was a learner-centered teacher. Yet, I was puzzled.

Isn’t all learning focused on the student? The answer is a polite, “ no.”

In my opinion, what makes a student-centered curriculum a cut above traditional learning is the collaborative nature of the process, accountable talk between students, and independent learning centers.

Sometimes life hands you an experience you don’t understand until many years later. This is one of them in my life.

Making the Transition to Student-Centered Curriculum

Many years ago, I was fortunate enough to become a director of the youth theater at the same time that I became a teacher. I would teach junior high English classes during the week and direct plays on the weekend.

When I began my teaching career, there were very few drama teacher jobs open, and the job market was bleak. It was the late 1970’s, and a glut of teachers sought employment. In college, I trained to become a professional actor. The professional acting gigs were limited too, and Broadway was on a downswing.

I’m glad I listened to my father. He advised me to attain my teaching certificate so I would have something to fall back on if the acting profession didn’t work out. Over time, I found the professional theater world wasn’t my cup of tea anyway, and teaching better suited me.

I taught English for three years. I never student taught the class, and English was one of my minors in college. Like most beginning teachers, I was excited but overwhelmed and intimidated by my responsibility.

Those years were some of the most difficult in my life for various reasons, both personal and professional, yet I gained insight in a way I never have again.

For a creative person like me, the day-to-day teaching of grammar and sentence structure was drudgery. I never admitted it to anyone, however.

Almost out of desperation on my part, I began to change my teaching methods to ones that I thought were more fun and exciting (unknowingly moving towards a student-centered curriculum). I knew I needed to change my core teaching strategies if I was going to make it.

If we had to learn where to put a semicolon in a sentence and how to use commas, by darn, we could make it more interesting.

This would be the beginning of my learner-centered teacher experience, but I certainly didn’t realize it at the time. I just wanted the class to be more interesting for everyone!

I noticed the students enjoyed working in groups on just about anything I put in front of them. When they entered class, they seemed happier and more enthusiastic, something that wasn’t occurring before my desperate move.

More than anything, I knew if they were like me, they learned best if they were engaged with a student-centered curriculum. I began to allow students to learn together certain subjects in the curriculum—creating comic books about a science fiction book by studying both, for example.

It did my heart good to see students who otherwise might have been lost in a regular class become engaged in their learning because they were discovered with their peers rather than alone. This simple movement of core teaching strategies made all the difference in the world.

The classroom was always noisy. A teacher friend of mine said my classroom was “organized chaos.” She was correct! I liked it that way until I retired.

On Saturdays, I would do the same thing with acting students on a stage. One of my first productions to direct was a play version ofPinocchio(ad). I remember having the students look at photos of marionettes and come up with the physicality of the puppet characters. (Remember, we didn’t have VCR’s yet or Netflix. Maybe that was better?)

Twelve years later, after staying home with our young daughters, I returned to the classroom (now a drama teacher). I noticed other educators were using a student-centered curriculum, and I wasn’t alone in being a learner-centered teacher. This relieved me not only for my own sake but for that of the students, that they were both receiving and understanding the student-centered curriculum.

Obviously, it wasn’t my doing that made this magically occur for other teachers. My guess is that other beginning teachers were doing the same in their classrooms. We were part of education reform in our high school years when teachers were attempting to make their subjects more engaging and allow us to take semester-length classes in certain subjects. I took a semester course in the study of Russia, for example.

A drama classroom is always some version of a student-centered curriculum. Humans are creative beings and require the need to make choices.

It is not uncommon in a drama classroom to see several groups of students researching theater history in a variety of ways—one group is building a small Elizabethan stage, while another is acting out a Realism play, and another is creating Greek masks.

By collaborating with others, the students must discuss, concede, and acquiesce to their peers. If for no other reason than the aforementioned ones, a student-centered curriculum is vital for our students as they enter the job force.

As long as the teacher gives clear instructions and expectations, it is very acceptable to me for students to educate themselves on the subject by which they are inspired.

This is the exact purpose of a student-centered curriculum. It is not difficult to be a learner-centered teacher…it just takes a mindset change and a shift in your core teaching strategies.

Another part of the student-centered curriculum environment is helping students to become accountable for their learning and conversations.

When I taught sixth graders about the origin of theater, the students discussed its possible beginnings by quoting the information they learned from studying it with a partner. Sometimes their conversations were as thought-provoking as any college theater appreciation class I taught.

For several years, students used software that created a play with comic book characters. It was sensational! Not only did the students learn how to craft a play, create characters, and design a set, but they also learned new computer skills. There is very little more freeing for a student than to learn something new with very little help from a teacher. Independent learning is a top priority in student-centered learning and student-centered curriculum, in my opinion.

The moral of the story is this—even an old dog can learn new tricks. Or maybe she thought she forgot she knew the trick. Or maybe she thought she forgot and then remembered she knew the trick but forgot it again…that happens, you know.

However, any way you look at it, it is easy to remember the precious moments of my teaching career by reflecting on the many student-centered curriculum aha moments of my own and my successful shift to becoming a learner-centered teacher.

(Thanks for that, Deborah!)

Building the Skills That Matter Most

Here’s what kept me doing this work, even on the days when it’s hard.

The students I taught in 2007 are adults now. Some of them are thriving. Some of them aren’t. And when I hear from former students, which still happens often thanks to email and social media, I often ask them what they remember from my class.

Almost never do they mention a specific historical fact. They don’t recite dates or name treaties or list causes of wars.

They remember the projects. They remember working in groups. They remember figuring things out together and presenting their findings and feeling proud of what they created.

They remember the skills, not the content. They remember that my classroom made us feel like a family…we laughed, fought, but at the end of the day, everyone felt supported.

The world these students entered after graduation doesn’t care much about the details of the Industrial Revolution. But it cares enormously about problem-solving skills, about the ability to collaborate with people who think differently, about communication skills and interpersonal skills, and the capacity to learn new things independently.

When I design instructional strategies around student-centered principles, I’m not just teaching history. I’m teaching students how to think, how to work with others, how to persist through challenges, and how to take charge of their learning. Those are the skills that mattered when they left my classroom.

And honestly? They’re also the skills that make teaching worth doing.

When I see a quiet student find her voice during a group presentation, or watch a struggling reader light up because he finally understood a complex topic through a hands-on activity, or hear students continuing a debate about historical ethics as they walk out the door…those moments reminded me why I started teaching in the first place. And now I see these breakthroughs happening to the teachers I coach, too.

Practical First Steps for Tomorrow

If you’re reading this and thinking you’d like to try some of these approaches but don’t know where to start, here’s my advice.

Pick one class period and one unit. Just one.

Look at your upcoming content and ask yourself: where could students take more ownership? Where could they work together instead of alone? Where could they create something instead of just consuming information?

Maybe it’s a single lesson where you replace a lecture with a jigsaw activity. Maybe it’s a project you’ve been doing for years that could become more open-ended, giving students more choices in how they demonstrate understanding. Maybe it’s just committing to five minutes less teacher talk and five minutes more student discussion each day.

Start small. See what happens. Talk to your students about what worked and what didn’t.

The teachers I train who are most successful with this transition aren’t the ones who overhaul everything overnight. They’re the ones who experiment, reflect, and gradually build a classroom culture where students expect to be active participants in their learning.

The Bottom Line

Student-centered teaching isn’t about doing less. It’s about doing things differently.

It’s about trusting that students want to learn, even when they don’t act like it. It’s about designing experiences that make learning inevitable, not optional. It’s about using your expertise not to deliver information, but to create the conditions where students discover it for themselves.

After almost two decades in education, twelve of them in the classroom and the rest training teachers exclusively, I’m more convinced than ever that this is the most effective way to teach. Not because it’s trendy or because Google rewards it, but because I’ve watched it work for over 1,700 of my own students across every kind of background and ability level, and now thousands of students of the hundreds of teachers I have helped adapt to these methods as well.

The students who struggled in traditional classrooms? They thrived when given different ways to learn.

The students who were already successful? They developed a deeper understanding and better interpersonal skills than any worksheet could provide.

And me? I finally enjoyed teaching the way I’d always hoped I would.

If you’re curious about trying some of these core teaching strategies in your own classroom, start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can. Your students will meet you there, and together, you’ll build something better than either of you could create alone.

Want to take it one step further? Check out my step-by-step program, The Classroom Reset.

Author Contribution:

Deborah Baldwin is a recently retired award-winning drama teacher having taught drama for thirty-eight years both for the public and private sector. In addition, she has directed over 250 plays and musicals with children and adults alike. She is a rock star grandma to her granddaughters, a happily married wife, and mother to two grown daughters and one stepson. Her cat, Lala would like it mentioned Deborah is her handmaiden and serves her every whim. You can learn more about Deborah at her blog,  Dramamommaspeaks, her TeachersPayTeachers store Dramamommaspeaks,or her Facebook page for her award-winning middle-grade book, Bumbling Bea (ad).

This article was originally published on November 5, 2020.